this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
185 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Litterally this. I won't (and most people won't) feel morally wrong once I stop paying for Disney's content.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean if you were sharing someone's password, wouldn't you already not be paying? If you were paying for an account, you would have your own password so this would not be an issue.

I'm not pointing this out to be "pro Disney" because I couldn't give a half-shit there, but I always have to remind people that password sharing is bad security and shouldn't be done.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Some legit customers are fucked by the anti-password sharing methods some companies have used. Hulu, for instance, locks you out of live TV service if your IP address changes more than 4 times in a year. My ISP goes down a couple times a week, and changes my IP address every time. Every 4th time, I need to call Hulu and inform them that I, in fact, have not relocated my television, and it remains bolted to the wall. My ISP wants $40/month for a static IP address, so it's in their best interest to keep changing my IP address as often as possible.

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The Netflix one screwed me... I go to hospital 3 times a week for 5 hours of dialysis. But Netflix viewed that as a second household and wanted me to pay for a second account to use my own account in 2 locations

Now I pay for zero accounts and still get any Netflix shows I want through alternative methods

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wait...How does Netflix treat it if someone travels for a week? I thought you only had to "check-in" at the "home" location every 30 days or something like that.

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's what they changed it to after I had already left... At first they only gave you 2 weeks at other locations for the year

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

Whaaat? 2 weeks per year? It wouldn't have affected me, but how would traveling customers keep watching legitimately?

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I spent seasons abroad and netflix started to delete my downloads

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well that's another reason I'm glad I didn't go with Hulu with Live TV. The main reason being they solely rely on IP geolocation from what I can tell, which is generally trash. With YouTube TV if the location is incorrect at least I have the option of logging in to verify my actual location using my phone.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't seem to be based on geolocation from what I can tell. My subnet hasn't changed in a few years, just the last octet of my IP address. The geolocation when looked up has remained the same the entire time. If my IP address changes from x.x.x.23 to x.x.x.24, they consider it a "home location change".

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The initial mapping of the local channels seemed to be when I did a trial. Despite having to put in my home address I was getting local channels from a TV market about 150mi away (coincidentally where my IP incorrectly geolocates to about half the time) even though I know other people that have used it and get our correct local channels.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

I don't use Hulu live TV, so I don't know if the local channels are mapped correctly. They should be, as the geo IP for our address is in the correct county.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have 2 homes, I’m not paying for Hulu twice.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As long as you segregate credentials and whichever service you’re sharing doesn’t expose any critical data like cc info what’s the risk?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing, it's usually just the one set of credentials and it has access to everything. Although to be fair they don't store the actual CC details anymore, just bank tokens.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Then take on yourself to help educate whoever doesn’t create a specific set of credentials to share accounts… But as we said back then - sharing is caring.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What bad habit? Proving entertainment to your loved ones on the house? Because as long as the account is created specifically for the purpose of being shared there’s absolutely no bad habit in that…Being generous is considered cool no?