this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
255 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sam Altman says "the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety."

Not 24 hours ago, he seemed to back Anthropic "supporting our warfighters" as long as two "red lines" weren't crossed, though his tepid support was laden with five instances of "I think" and one "mostly."

The two "red lines" in question:

  • Domestic mass surveillance
    (presumably, foreign mass surveillance is ok)
  • Autonomous weapons
    (likely because they would be held legally liable for misfires)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

WHAT IN THE ACTUAL FUCK IS HAPPENING:https://www.opb.org/article/2026/02/27/openais-sam-altman-weighs-in-on-pentagon-anthropic-dispute/

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago

Altman has always been a liar. The first company he ran and sold was found to be lying about the user count.

More perfect union did a video on altman's habitual lying if you want to go look it up.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

If you read Sam Altman's actual comment, it's really clear that he wasn't committing to anything with OpenAI. He was barely committing to anything in his own personal opinion.

"I don’t personally think the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these companies. But I also think that companies that choose to work with the Pentagon, as long as it is going to comply with legal protections and the few red lines that the field, we have, I think we share with Anthropic and that other companies also independently agree with, I think it is important to do that. For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company, and I think they really do care about safety, and I’ve been happy that they’ve been supporting our warfighters."

[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

A big thinker, he is.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Huh? I'm not good with sarcasm