this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
364 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReallyCoolDude@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How could any person with some programing literacy event thinking about installing openclaw. A malware ridden by critical bugs

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think there's anything wrong with running Openclaw. What is way too brave for my taste is giving it access to accounts with your personal data, or the filesystem in your computer. That's a disaster waiting to happen.

I run it in an isolated server, and it doesn't have access to my data - if it goes tits up, it deletes unimportant stuff only. If anyone gets access to the credentials in it, it's a bunch of budget-limited API keys, so they can spend all of $4 on openrouter. Maybe the riskiest bit is its Google account. I went with the approach of giving it its own Google account, so that it can create docs and calendar events and then add me, rather than getting access to my Google account. But then again... That account has no payment info, nothing that I would be mega worried if it got leaked...

Sure, it might limit the usefulness a bit, but I think installing something like this is only acceptable if you sandbox it and don't let it access valuable information. Going full mad scientist on something as "alpha" as this, letting it run wild with your info is nuts.

[–] flux@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

I went with the approach of giving it its own Google account, so that it can create docs and calendar events and then add me, rather than getting access to my Google account.

I wonder though: if Google can link this account to you as its actual owner, I wonder if there's a risk if the bot does something against the ToS?

I hope you have backups of your Google account..

[–] XLE@piefed.social 52 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

She's the head AI Safety Expert for Meta. The field might as well be labeled AI Misunderstander.

[–] ReallyCoolDude@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

I work with some data sciencetists and ml engineers on web projects. They might be good at etls, fine tuning etx, but dont let them touch anything with a public.layer or infra constraints.

[–] blargbluuk@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

you answered your own question here