this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
271 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It was fucked before this though. The clean ups of the 70's onwards to 2000 is over, it's been on a decline since, factory farms dumping shit water, dumping waste on fields, sewage waste, combined with chemical bullshit, on farm fields. There is so much less thought to our health and safety than we think, than used to be the case.

[–] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

TL;DR Yes, but reality is nuanced, as always.

The recent federal bullshit is a definitely the culmination of decades of industry trying to undo environmental regulations. Moving forward, it's going to take serious efforts and funds to repair and rebuild how much the US EPA and federal sciences were gutted. Some states are actually doing far better. On the environmental side of things, Ohio is actually pretty good. The programs are based on the federal ones and also have more protective limits to some things. Unfortunately, not all states have the resources or programs in place.

To your specific points, treated sewage solids have been spread on ag land for decades. Concentrates animal feeding operations (CAFOs) have been polluting waterways through permit exemptions for decades. A huge issue with land applied sewage solids is PFAS, which is just now publicly coming to light. There are vast deficiencies in the way things have been happening all along that still happened in the "golden era".

Negligent or intentional releases of hazardous waste onto the surface or into waterways has been greatly curtailed across the board. There are going to to be ups and downs in speed due to the reality of investigation and cleanup work, regulatory review time frames, and the thorough nature of the programs. The "fast" version of a facility cleanup that I've been part of, where problems were addressed as they were discovered, still took from 2009 to 2018, then massive reporting efforts that took US EPA 5 years to come back with a final decision.

ETA: Most sites I have worked on in my career have been legacy contamination sites, meaning things happened in tue 50s-80s, and the companies responsible have been purchased 2 or 3 times since (or are entirely defunct). The companies that bought the sites and liabilities generally want to do the right thing and clean up the issues to mitigate human health and environmental risks. They also don't want to go bankrupt in the process, which is part of why things take so long. Environmental work is expensive, and the time frames for cleanup and monitoring can be years to decades to "in perpetuity" for some issues.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like you worked on RCRA sites

[–] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago

Yes, I work on both state and federally administrated RCRA closure and corrective action sites and state administrated CERCLA sites

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Environmental work is expensive, and the time frames for cleanup and monitoring can be years to decades to “in perpetuity” for some issues.

My immediate reaction when I read something like this is

  • it would be hella cheaper to not let it get that way, yet we keep letting it
  • both the purchasing companies and whatever level of government don’t want to get stuck with the bill for someone else’s mess - why isn’t that yet more incentive to not let it get that way?
[–] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago

Totally valid. Most of the sites I work on, the contamination happened before regulations were written. Chlorinated solvents are a big problem from metal degreasing, industrial cleaning, etc. Pre-hazardous waste laws, the manufacturer instructions were to pour spent solvents on the ground and let it evaporate. With current knowledge that is clearly not a good thing to do, but the hazards were unknown to the general public. So that stuff happened in the 1950s to early 1970s is still being cleaned up. It would have been ideal for it not to have happened in the first place, but it's not like companies are doing that anymore (if they are operating appropriately).

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I was going to say, especially in this era, "lawful" does not necessarily mean "good," and can often be far from it.