I said just because. Not that effeminate men aren’t capable of being nonbinary, merely that it is not sufficient (or necessary for that matter). You have to like actually not identify as entirely a man.

But it’s not my place to fight I’m very much in the binary side of transness.

[–] tan00k@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Whose authority says it's not sufficient? If they say they are nonbinary, they are nonbinary.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

OP means “don’t assume someone is non-binary because they are an effeminate man” and not “you aren’t non-binary just because you are an effeminate man”

[–] tan00k@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I suppose that's possible, but the thing you say OP is not saying is literally a quote. So at best it's worded poorly.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)