this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
29 points (93.9% liked)
Technology
82329 readers
4371 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did you read the article?
The contact lens is just the display, it still requires inductive power and external display source to really do anything. Plenty to "tear apart" and fit into existing equipment.
The lens itself becoming a complete device in its entirety is something I think we are decades, potentially centuries from tech which is that minituarized. Smart rings exist, but they're still orders of magnitude simpler devices.
If you're gonna be wearing a computer and battery on your temple anyway, why is sticking the display in your eyeball, the simplest solution here?
I did read the article. I think having the contact display plus the external unit might prove to be more elegant in implementation than a purpose-built integrated HUD. It doesn't have to be magic tech to compete with reflecting a small LCD off a visor, which takes up space and probably won't work for e.g. underwater welding.