this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
255 points (96.4% liked)

Games

16806 readers
867 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
255
Frustrations with Cities Skylines 2 are starting to boil over among city builder fans and content creators alike: "It's insulting to have a game release that way" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If only there was some method to check the gameplay after release and decide if you want to purchase.

Emotionally pre-ordering a game based on your own expectations is a meme.

I wanted to play KSP2 and waited an actual decade for it so I could go to space with my friends. Upon release I checked gameplay and reviews and never ended up buying it. I voted with my wallet and not my complaints, it's that simple

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Emotionally pre-ordering a game based on your own expectations is a meme.

I shouldn't expect a sequel to do at least what the previous game did and a little more? I don't have to pre-order a thing to still be disappointed about the state of it's release when it doesn't even meet the bare minimum expectation for a sequel.

It even works in the opposite way. I didn't get The Witcher 3 at launch because of the expectations set by the first 2 games being technical nightmares. But it turned out to actually be good.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I shouldn’t expect a sequel to do at least what the previous game did and a little more?

Should it be the case? Yes. But we've been burned enough times that it's incredibly naive to expect it.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree with that sentiment for movies; not so much with video games. I can think of way more video game sequels that were actually better than the originals than video game sequels that were worse.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I agree. But also we've seen so many games come out that are absolute disasters that if you are buying it on day 1 (or even before) instead of waiting for the reviews to come out before buying it, you only have yourself to blame when you get burned.

I loved C:S and was very excited for this sequel to come out...but I haven't bought it because the reviews before it came out were mixed (being generous lol) and so I still haven't bought it. I'll wait or maybe never buy it. Likely I wait for the price to drop to like 15 bucks and buy it then.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Weve been burned precisely because no one held the gaming industry accountable for the state of their games.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Speak for yourself, I haven't bought a game at release for well over a decade, and even at that point it was pretty rare for me.