this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
495 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

20845 readers
1025 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 73 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I just love the quote:

So, we need, I, I would really, I’m demanding...

He starts with needing help, starts to say he just really wants it, then pivota to demanding it.

The fact that he went thru those steps shows how much pressure he's facing.

His two biggest wings of influence has been Israel and American christo-fascists, if they start pulling him in opposite ways, he can't hold onto both.

He's fucked, but so are the rest of us by extension. Hopefully just till midterms at least.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 31 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The thing is, as a foreigner, and speaking bluntly, this is on the entire American population, voting him in once was one thing, but not dealing with Jan 6 harshly under Bidens administration did nothing more than encourage them and their billionaire backers. IF there's no false flag operation to cancel the midterms and IF presidential elections are held and the democrats get into power, you lot are going to have to overhaul your entire system to ensure another Trump doesn't happen. And honestly speaking I can't realistically see that happening.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The thing is, as a foreigner, and speaking bluntly, this is on the entire American population

No problem.

To put it bluntly I don't expect Americans to understand our political system, so I'm not surprised when foreigners clearly don't. Shits complicated and nonsensical

I just wish more would ask questions instead of sharing uninformed opinions as facts, but maga thinking isn't reserved for Americans...

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 0 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

In the age of misinformation and people using influencers and podcasters as "news and information" it's become the norm unfortunately. I tend to try and get as broad a view as possible and filter out the bullshit. And admittedly I don't understand the PAC system or the electoral college, and I can't condone lobbying as we've seen it's detrimental effect on general rights to Americans as well as pushing policy. Again, these don't affect us as foreigners, but they tend to push certain policies that end up with wider reaching effects.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The PAC system is legal bribery with the added bonus of the public being unaware of who is doing the bribing.

Nations use it to "influence" our representatives, from Israel to Saudi Arabia; the USA is open to all interests with enough cash involved.

Corporations and billionaires also prefer Super PACs, as what they actually want can be very unpopular publicly (like keeping minimum wage down to seven dollars an hour).

So, for example, if your (the briber) position is right wing, you contribute to the R party; if the R party won't accommodate your position for some reason, the Ds will (but it will cost you a lot more); if your position is left wing, you contribute to the D party; if the D party won't accommodate your position, the Rs will (but it will cost you a lot more).

With enough money, you can actually change the major parties political platform. See the history of unions, for example. The Democrats were once the "labor party", when unions were 40% of the workforce in the 1940s. Over the decades, it's now down to 10%. Or "state's rights", the Republicans position for many decades. Now, today they are all about flexing federal power.

This has absolutely nothing to do with what the American voters actually want at any time.

Electoral college? Oh dear God I won't even try to explain, it's different for every state (like a province, and there are 50).

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

considering the state of mainstream american news, pretty sure those listening to "influencers" are better informed. especially as far as iran/isreal/american imperialism in general is concerned

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

or the electoral college

That's the part that's relevant...

Whether a state goes 51% of 100%, counts the same.

This leads to depressed turnout and obviously no elections being on "all Americans". Most of our votes for president don't matter because most states go one way or the other.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 3 hours ago

Whether a state goes 51% of 100%, counts the same.

While the Electoral college has it's own major issues. Awarding of the votes is done because 48 State Legislatures believe all the votes should go to the winner. Maine and Nebraska award their vote on a semi-proportional system. A true proportional system would go a long way of addressing some of the major issues such as a someone's Presidential vote being utterly meaningless. A Republican in California or Democrat in Idaho. (https://electoralvotemap.com/which-states-split-their-electoral-votes/)

This is the problem when people say "Vote Blue". Sure voting Democrat/Republican for US House or lower elections does matter, Senate and Presidential elections? If you live in a Red State, a vote for the Senate or President is completely meaningless in having a say of who gets elected.

Sure, states flip from red to blue and vice versa. However, that only happens if Parties really invest in that state to change it. Parties don't have unlimited funds, they pay attention to swing states which would have a better return on investment.

It's the inherent flaw of first past the post/winner take all style of voting.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

That's not even the worst...

Our House of representatives is supposed to make up for it, but each rep represents over 20x the people they did when the country was founded.

The reason we lost so much representation, is the room they occasionally meet in would be too cramped if they kept adding chairs to it.

But just in general, it's almost always best to blame political leaders for a government's actions and not just blame every person living there.

Good and bad.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

the cap on House seats was a deliberate move to restrict the power of cities/progressive forces of the time, it wasnt some accident/short-sightedness

make it more expensive to campaign (because you have to reach so many more people) and you effectively force out independent canidates

even if House seats were increased to something sane like 150-200k pop/seat (currently at 800k+, iirc), the senate effectively gives 2/3rds of national political power to 1/3rd of the country. there is no means for the House to completely bypass the Senate

[–] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

What if those reps had a big, beautiful former ballroom to occupy? That would be pretty cool, someone should get on that.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 1 points 10 hours ago

But just in general, it’s almost always best to blame political leaders for a government’s actions and not just blame every person living there.

Good and bad.

Agreed, frustration gets to me, considering I come from the Middle East I tend to have very conflicting emotions, having grown up in England I appreciate law and order, equality and an attitude of live and let live. But when my friends and family are in direct danger, my anger rages.

[–] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

If they do it right they only need 22% of the popular vote to win the presidentance, so yeah don't say it is all Americans that want this when such a small number is needed to win.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

you still think voting will get you out of the fascism you invited in?

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 52 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

i've been loudly condemning trump for well over 10 years, losing relationships with friends and family because of it. I didn't "invite" shit, and i accept zero responsibility for the bullshit fascist...whatever the fuck you call this place now. this country is full of fucking racist brainwashed sheep and/or just plain gullible morons.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

agreed... sorry you are caught up in the generalization

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe if people actually showed the fuck up it might. But there's so many "voting doesn't do shit" people that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Do you really think "voting" will, for example, bring about real change, like universal healthcare?

Over 70% of voters want universal healthcare, as polls have demonstrated for over THIRTY YEARS. It doesn't matter.

Think of voting as participating in a poll or something, like voting for your favorite "American Idol".

It won't actually change the show, it's just part of the entertainment.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The way I see it, there are 3 choices.

  1. Vote (effectively). If you still have a glimmer of hope that things can be changed for the better, you need to be doing this. Job one is to keep republicans out of power, vote for whomever is going to beat them. Job 2 is to push Democrats further left in the primaries. Mamdani showed us that this can happen, reluctantly at first, but the party will respond to its voters. Key word there is "voters" if you don't vote, they don't know about you, and won't give a fuck about you.

  2. Disruption. I can't in good faith call for violence, but if you genuinely believe it is impossible to fix the system by voting, you need to be in the streets disrupting day to day operation of the system that oppresses you. Protest, strike, squat, whatever you gotta do, but you can't do it halfway. If you aren't literally ready to fight for your life then, this option isn't for you.

  3. Do nothing. You can just sit around and bitch about things. Whatever happens is (almost) equally your fault as it is the people who voted for it. You'll end up against the wall just like the other two groups, but it will take the nazis you left the door open for, a little bit longer to get around to you. I've got no respect for the people in this group, no one should TBH.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

you are not wrong… but I was referring to the pedo president sabotagging elections… if he is OK comitting the country to war to cover his past crimes, cancelling elections would be a walk in the park

[–] Josey_Wales@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Of course not. If the first move on a chess board was to simply take your opponent’s king, that would always be the first move in every game.

Having the midterm vote suppressed is just one sacrificial pawn in the direction of what needs to be done to eradicate fascism.

Knowing what to do isn’t that valuable if you don’t time it correctly. It’s not just one person or party. It is systemic and requires a critical mass of history to be successful.

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Invited in? I didn’t invite any of this in. Not by my vote, not by my letters to government officials, and not by my protests.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm sure the world is very interested in whether you invited him or not, just as much as in who in Russia did or didn't vote for Putin.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's a generalization... "you" as in "Americans" voted this in TWICE!

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

both asscheeks of the uniparty are at fault for creating the circumstances

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago

I feel like it is more basic than that.

I think his quote transitioning from asking for help to demanding others “step up” just reveals something he was taught early on—“never show weakness”.

Along with “never admit wrong doing” and “deny ‘til you die”, if you just set a simpleton up with a few basic, immoral, rules and hundreds of millions of dollars, you get Trump.