this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
737 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

82798 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jefferyjefferson@lemmy.org 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

Every programmer working on a problem right now knows that's complete bullshit.

That said, I would love for robots to take over all of our jobs. Just make sure they're working for all of us and not just the people at the top.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 10 hours ago

Just make sure they’re working for all of us and not just the people at the top.

Yeah, I put a request for just that in the corporate comment box, hope to hear back with those assurances real soon now.

[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That said, I would love for robots to take over all of our jobs. Just make sure they’re working for all of us and not just the people at the top.

It seems to me that you live in some kind of rainbow world, this will never happen. If robots replace humans, it means that humans, as useless consumers of resources, will be destroyed.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Is it okay that robots dispose of billionaires along with everyone else? Okay, I don't care anymore.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

lol There aren't even discussions happening about rules of robotics or anything along those lines. It's just a race into the unknown with no real sense of direction.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

The dumb human way. Asimov was human too.

[–] ready_for_qa@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

We can achieve purpose without production, but nobody understands what that looks like and they want to hold onto their roles in production until they feel secure about not needing to produce for society to survive.

I'm hopeful that humans won't need to trade their lives to make others rich. AI and Robotics might be a path toward that if the people are the benefactors.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Worked with playwright in C# .NET today and lol the "AIs" knew shit about it. Constantly mixed C# with JavaScript and Python code together and it was incoherent

[–] ready_for_qa@programming.dev 0 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Then your input is wrong. I mainly work in .net c# and playwright and I have agents building my e2e tests in playwright with just test cases and test steps. These are custom agents I built myself that have the guardrails in place for the agent to stay in bounds.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 0 points 10 hours ago

The agents are getting pretty good at reviewing code, too. You don't have to listen to everything they say, but they do point out a lot of stuff that you pretty much have to admit: yeah, that would be better if I changed it to the suggested revision.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wasnt building test cases :)

[–] ready_for_qa@programming.dev 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The point was that AI can use playwright and write in C# just fine. Tests was an example of that.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 10 hours ago

Tests are a great use for AI coding, lately. Six months ago Claude Sonnet was writing tests that always passed without testing anything, that has improved dramatically with Opus 4.5/4.6 - it actually hits the functionality now, not just code coverage.