this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
317 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Scat fetish typically involves grown adults.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults.

You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me.

Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me.

Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 19 hours ago

You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up.

"Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise.