this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
450 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
4138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 337 points 23 hours ago (22 children)

Making users wait 24 hours doesn't improve security; it's an anti-competitive change designed to make the Google Play store seem like less of a hassle in comparison.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 94 points 22 hours ago (21 children)

I can actually see where it can improve security against scammers trying to scam elderly and non-tech savvy people.

  • Scammer tries to get someone to install malware from their site
  • Victim isn't familiar with sideloading, but scammer instructs them
  • Victim hits the first time 24 hour block and has to restart and wait
  • The restart alone breaks contact with the scammer, scam thwarted

For the rest of us that know our way around Android, it's just a one time annoyance, after completing all the steps to enable sideloading, you won't have to wait 24 hours anymore.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 63 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

It’s going to be effective, but it’s a sad world where you have to create a total nanny state because there exist a subset of users who are INCREDIBLY stupid.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Is it still a subset when it's the majority?

And to be honest, the level of effort scammers are willing to go through is shocking, and AI's just making it easier for them.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

Evidence that any significant percentage of people, never mind the majority, is getting scammed? Then how many of them via app installs?

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

And to be honest, the level of effort scammers are willing to go through is shocking

Is it? If you live in a country like India, then a single successful scam will be able to pay for years of living expenses

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 33 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Anything less than the whole is a subset, yes.

Strictly mathematically even the whole world is a subset of the whole world.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Something about the smartest bears vs the dumbest humans.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)