this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
255 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82855 readers
3897 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There are a surprising amount of false positives when using object detection on maritime imagery. While a carrier is a spec, there are a ton of specs in the ocean that can look similar enough. Plus, weather has a huge hand to play. If it were always perfectly clear, then it's an easier problem, but one cloud can really mess up the detection. Ultimately, ship detection is a difficult problem (not intractable but still hard).

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

False positives are fine, you assign 1, 10, 50, 100 analysts to review hits. You only need to find it once, then the search area becomes incredibly small for each subsequent satellite pass.

I'm not saying that it is easy, just that you don't need to have a surface ship within 15 nm in order to see it.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm not saying that it is easy

It kind of sounds like you're saying that. Anyways, there's a reason submarines exist