this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
342 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If it worked out, the idle Windows 11 RAM usage would’ve been around 4.8GB

Me on beefy Linux distro with a metric ton of garbage installed: 3.2GB

Good luck vibe coding memory efficiency...

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Copilot. Make no mistakes and be efficient with memory usage.

Hahahahahah

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You no want 6GB LLM running as a system service???

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Our Microslop overlords have said that I do, so I guess I do? I don't know. Hand on. I'm asking Copi--- I mean... I'm thinking...

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could download more RAM by buying Copilot cloud subscription!

Now there's an idea!

[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

16GB RAM. ~3500 packages building up a nightmarish franken-debian of like ~250ish apps. 1.5GB RAM usage on boot. optimisation really does wonders

edit: yes, true story btw

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is it even possible to vibe code efficient memory use properly?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ok. is it even remotely more cost-effective than doing the old-fashioned optimizing?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably not but maybe. It's a gamble that I'm guessing most MBAs would love to make!

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i guess a better way is just make something less RAM heavy from the get go.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good luck with that if it's being vibe coded.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i don't think vibe coding will be that sophisticated any time soon.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as they are based on LLMs, I don't think it ever will be. But it will get better at pretending it is and passing tests.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

the more i know about LLM and their numerous issues the less enthusiastic i am about this whole current AI thing.