this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
47 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
47
Google warns quantum computers could hack encrypted systems by 2029 (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 12 hours ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Banks, governments and technology providers need to be prepared for quantum computer hackers capable of breaking most existing encryption systems by 2029, Google has warned.

The tech company said in a blogpost that quantum computers would pose a “significant threat to current cryptographic standards” before the end of the decade and urged other companies to follow its lead.

The company, owned by Alphabet, said: “The encryption currently used to keep your information confidential and secure could easily be broken by a large-scale quantum computer in coming years.”

As it stands, quantum computers – which can rapidly carry out complex tasks – are a nascent technology with great potential and significant obstacles to being widely usable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fairly not super experienced on things. but how viable is a layered system, does it just prohibitively slow or storage consuming or is it moderately feasible to say double encapsulate everything.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

Huh, interesting; that's a good question. I'm not actually sure about that; it'd be a good thing for me to dig into more. Thanks for the thought!