this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
168 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
2995 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
168
Leaked memo suggests Red Hat's chugging the AI Kool-Aid (www.theregister.com)
submitted 5 hours ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

An internal memo dispatched by senior execs at Red Hat suggests the software biz is starting to push AI tooling within its Global Engineering department. RHEL may be about to get some Windows 11-style "improvements."

It carries the heading "Engineering that's evolved and amplified for the AI era," and for any AI skeptics in the developer teams at Red Hat, the tone of the email may raise alarm bells. The times are changing, it states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

"Our roles: All Global Engineering roles will evolve. The focus will shift from 'AI as a tool used on occasion' to 'AI automation as a way to scale the delivery of value to customers.' Our associates' skillsets will grow as they become proficient in these tools."

The "scale the delivery of value to customer" phrase is a massive red flag, it means they have no fucking clue what they are doing. If they did, they would be more clear about their thinking and reasoning and not use PR speak.

They do provide some more specifics that are quoted later in the article, but it still sounds like they haven't really thought this through:

The next few paragraphs of the memo are oddly repetitive. First, it says: "To lead in this era, we must evolve our operating model. The gap we face today isn't just technical – it's organizational. Today, we are beginning our transition to an Agentic Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to transform how Global Engineering and Products deliver."

"'All-in' product scope: We aren't looking for a single scrum team to experiment in a vacuum. To avoid bottlenecks, we will move entire products or sub-products to this model simultaneously." Scrum is a reference to the Agile development model, about which The Register's Rupert Goodwins expressed reservations back in 2024.

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What's not clear about "delivering value to customers"? I think it is very specific to [product] that [company] delivers!

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"Value" is a term so ambiguous, it's actually worse than not saying anything.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago

There's some value in your words here! 👍