this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
515 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
3790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Why is everyone forgetting the parents in this shit. They are the ones giving their kids access to this shit, not monitoring and moderating their access to this shit, and letting screens do the job of raising their kids instead of doing it themselves.

[–] sleepyplacebo@rblind.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah someone has to be paying for the phones and internet access, both mobile internet and or home internet or if they don't have a phone yet, the tablet , desktop or laptop with internet access. It's usually the parents paying for this stuff.

There are parental controls built into the Android builds of all the various mainstream manufacturers. The main exception might be for example small companies selling phones with custom Android OS distributions or people who install their own where parental controls are not built in, but that isn't what the vast vast majority of people are using let alone installing on their child's phone.

There are parental control options built into IOS too.  They allow parents to setup a variety of controls. 

https://families.google/familylink/

https://support.apple.com/en-us/105121

The following article from the Electronic Frontier Foundation cites various research about how a majority of social media use even by people under 13 is often done with parents knowledge and even direct help.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/congress-wants-hand-your-parenting-big-tech

Most Social Media Use By Younger Kids Is Family-Mediated

If lawmakers picture under-13 social media use as a bunch of kids lying about their age and sneaking onto apps behind their parents’ backs, they’ve got it wrong. Serious studies that have looked at this all find the opposite: most under-13 use is out in the open, with parents’ knowledge, and often with their direct help.

A large national study published last year in Academic Pediatrics found that 63.8% of under-13s have a social media account, but only 5.4% of them said they were keeping one secret from their parents. That means roughly 90% of kids under 13 who are on social media aren’t hiding it at all. Their parents know. (For kids aged thirteen and over, the “secret account” number is almost as low, at 6.9%.)

Earlier research in the U.S. found the same pattern. In a well-known study of Facebook use by 10-to-14-year-olds, researchers found that about 70% of parents said they actually helped create their child’s account, and between 82% and 95% knew the account existed. Again, this wasn’t kids sneaking around. It was families making a decision together.

2022 study by the UK’s media regulator Ofcom points in the same direction, finding that up to two-thirds of social media users below the age of thirteen had direct help from a parent or guardian getting onto the platform.

The typical under-13 social media user is not a sneaky kid. It’s a family making a decision together.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 4 hours ago

The parents are also suffering from the negative medical effects of algorithms designed to manipulate and addict. You're asking why a victim of drug abuse isn't a more responsible parent.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The same parents who scream anytime a teacher grades them fairly?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Teachers should be legally allowed to posses a metal gauntlet for backhanding idiot parents across the face.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You are correct, but that does not absolve the companies or the government of any responsibility. It should not be "anything goes" as far as intentionally addictive designs on anything with a screen for the same reason they can't just put cocaine in Doritos. They still engineer in what they can, but with some guardrails. And even in that case the regulations here in the US leave a lot to be desired.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Saying stop ignoring parental responsibility, doesnt mean ignore everyone elses culpability.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

What you say is true but it's off topic because that's not the current situation. What we're actually seeing right now is that parents literally do not want to take their devices away from their kids and they don't want to supervise their kids. It really is that simple.

This is not a situation where most parents are trying to do the right thing and they can't do enough and they need an extra hand. This is definitely a situation where many parents aren't even putting in a good effort.

You know like what if they didn't give their kid a cell phone. What if they took the cell phone away at 9:00 p.m. Most parents would never dream of doing either of those things.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Oh it's never the parents' fault, they're Parents.