this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
515 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
3790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

A 30% reduction of kids being exposed to these harmful platforms is a good thing and I'm glad to see it.

Also, all laws are imperfect, and expecting 100% efficacy is moronic.

[–] Ohh@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

As a parent who dont like id requirements but who also wants my children away from social media, this is my take:

Social tech does not require a tech solution, but instead a social solution, because social media is a social problem. My children has restricted access, no accounts etc. But that helps little when all the other parents believe social media to be fine. A law clearly sets a social norm, which apparently 30 % of parents understand.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but the politicians didn't sell the law at 30% efficiency. They sold it at something like 95% efficiency. So they lied and they haven't solved anything.

Maybe they could have used all of that money to run campaigns to help convince parents to properly supervise their children. Maybe that would have done more than this 30% figure.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe, instead of creating privacy-infringing laws or blaming parents, we actually dismantle the tech companies who created them and imprison their leaders. We all know corporate social media is cancer, that’s why we’re on Lemmy. So let’s fucking do something about the cancer instead targeting the victims or worse, exploiting the situation to expand the surveillance state.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

You don't think they'd happily target Lemmy if it were larger? It's still "social media" to them

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously. Murders still happen so lets legalize murder.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Such place exists. It's called middle east.

[–] Brownie@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

For whom exactly is it legal there though?

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

For those currently doing all the bombing, of course! 😉