this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
66 points (97.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68574 readers
117 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week's Supreme Court decision in Cox Communications reshaped the piracy liability landscape, creating new urgency for site-blocking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So how would this work theoretically? People in the states would just be prohibited from accessing certain sites and Google would remove them from results of searchs?

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 hours ago

Google already remove results in certain countries based on local laws, and as a response to DMCA complaints.