this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68574 readers
117 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week's Supreme Court decision in Cox Communications reshaped the piracy liability landscape, creating new urgency for site-blocking.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 32 points 3 hours ago

Literally every single large AI provider admits to committing large scale piracy. No congressional response.

Some members of the public are watching HBO shows because they're poor? FULL FORCE OF THE LAW

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 hours ago

Good news for fascists since it means there will be an easy way to force ISPs to block all "unlawful" content like Wikipedia or any other site that gives educational information to refute their current agendas or reflects opposing opinions that they consider "alternative facts".

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 8 points 2 hours ago

Sooner everything moves to something like i2p the better, there's no reason to be using the clearnet imo.

It's just a safer way of doing things and eventually things will be driven that direction anyway.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't other countries tried DNS level site blocking, and it's very easy to get around? Does it even make any difference? The strategy of ISP copyright letters has already trained Americans to use VPNs for this, it seems like the only difference will be that I will have to turn my VPN on before searching for torrents instead of just before actually opening my torrent client

[–] alakey@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago

DNS blocking is a paper wall indeed. However, this is just a step one. VPNs are already a target, so this will help them with justifying step 2 - introducing DPI to monitor all traffic and proactively block new VPNs and other obfuscation methods. Step 3 is more or less final, it's when they realize this is also not quite as efficient as they'd like and they'll get tired of the constant cat and mouse game, so the solution would have to be whitelisting approved websites and blocking everything else. It's amazing for billionaires and their corpos as that makes it nearly impossible for new projects to enter the market, and it's great for governments that desperately want to be authoritarian, but pesky constitutions, privacy laws and some such are getting in the way.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 hours ago

After 30 years of playing whack-a-mole with piracy sites, this time it will surely help.

[–] alakey@piefed.social 20 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ahhhh, there comes the american own great firewall, fantastic...

Wonder if we will suddenly see this same bullshit pop up in all the pro age verification countries now or a tad later to make it less obvious.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Several such movements have been going around since around September 2025, with some countries' governments, e.g. Brazil's current one, pushing for such for longer.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Eyyy I love that this link is making the rounds. Can’t take credit for the graph, but happy to help broaden visibility.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 58 minutes ago

I'm curious to know the connections between this and Collective Shout.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

So how would this work theoretically? People in the states would just be prohibited from accessing certain sites and Google would remove them from results of searchs?

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Its crazy how well the foot in the door technique works.