this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
862 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83500 readers
3971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 32 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

What's their motivation? "Protecting the children" from pictures of boobs?

Doubtful.

Instead, I think the AI companies are looking for ways to more easily distinguish human-made "content" from bot-made content, in order to decrease the amount of generative slop that ends up being fed back into their training data.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

They want other entities to be responsible for it so they don’t have to be.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Considering the fact that AI based age verification now usually involves taking a head shot and uploading it to the servers of the company, I'm guessing there is an element of facial data collection involved as well.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s anticompetitiveness.

They want to squash open models, and anyone too small to comply with this.

I say this in every thread, but the real AI “battle” is open-weights ML vs OpenAI style tech bro AI. And OpenAI wants precisely no one to realize that.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"Open weights" isn't worth a shit either.

If you don't have the access to training data or the computational power to bake it into a model, you are beholden to somebody's (or rather, some corporation's) binary blob. We're talking about the difference between freeware and FOSS effectively.

Not that it matters because all of thin generative AI stuff is for talentless tech bro chuds in the first place...

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Even not-fully-reproducible open-weights models are extremely important because they're poison to OpenAI, and they know it. It makes what they're trying to commodify and control effectively free and utilitarian.

But there are fully open models, too, with public training data.