this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
66 points (97.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68574 readers
117 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week's Supreme Court decision in Cox Communications reshaped the piracy liability landscape, creating new urgency for site-blocking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Good news for fascists since it means there will be an easy way to force ISPs to block all "unlawful" content like Wikipedia or any other site that gives educational information to refute their current agendas or reflects opposing opinions that they consider "alternative facts".

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Most isps just mess with the DNS, dnscrypt is a solution to make sure they can't. Best solution is not using dns in the first place though.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 3 hours ago

Best solution is not using dns in the first place though.

Use DNS over HTTPS (or TLS or QUIC). I think some browsers use it by default now. If there's country-specific blocks, use your own recursive DNS server.