this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
235 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

83600 readers
3570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hesh@quokk.au 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If Google knows it outputs falsehoods and lets it continue it becomes purposeful. That makes them lies in my book.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If a newspaper prints lies you don't say the physical piece of pulped up tree you are holding is lying to you, you say the author is.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If it's shown to the newspaper that they are lies and they keep on printing them, then yes I do call them liars as well. Whatever you want to call it, you must admit they are culpable for spreading disinformation.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

No, you are proving my point here. You say 'they' as in the publishers/owners/printers of the newspaper. You don't blame 'it' the literal, physical piece of paper you are holding in your hands.

In the same way that you would not say a clock was lying to you if it displays the wrong time.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

OK, so I don't blame the GPUs crunching out the LLM lies, or the HTML on the page, I blame Google the company that programmed them.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The point is, the LLM is not 'lying' to you. It's showing you information. It doesn't 'know' whether the information is true or not. It also doesn't 'care'. Because it is a statistical model and is incapable of those things. And if you scroll back to my initial point, I said "technically, it's not lying, because lying requires intent to deceive, and LLMs don't have intent"

[–] hesh@quokk.au 1 points 5 hours ago

What's the point of making this semantic difference though?