this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
919 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

83632 readers
4520 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

To illustrate what I mean more clearly, look at the top comments/replies for the NASA Artemis posts, as an example.

...It's basically all conspiracy theorists, and government skeptics.

Twitter's focusing the Artemis posts on them because it's what they want to see, and most engaging for them.

In the EFF's case, I'm not just talking about Musk's influence. The algorithm will only show the EFF to users who would be highly engaged by it. E.g., angry skeptics who wouldn't be swayed by the EFF anyway, or fans who already agree with the EFF. It's literally not going to show the EFF to people who need to see it, as Twitter's metrics would show it as unengaging.


This is the "false image" I keep trying to dispel. Twitter is less and less an "even spread" of exposure like people think it is, like it sort of used to be, more-and-more a hyper focused bubble of what you want to hear, and only what you want to hear. All the changes Musk is making are amplifying that. Maybe that's fine for some orgs, but there's no point in the EFF staying in that kind of environment, regardless of ethics.

[–] death916@piefed.death916.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

The what you want to see is truer than u think. I'm on all the fediverse sites but still use x for sports stuff mostly. If u like a post about say wild flowers that sneaks in it feels. If u refresh suddenly its full of wildflower posts in an instant. It works so quickly.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 12 hours ago

more-and-more a hyper focused bubble of what you want to hear, and only what you want to hear

*and only what Elon Musk wants you to hear.