this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
574 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

83753 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (5 children)

Bad actors submitting garbage code aren't going to read the documentation anyway, so the kernel should focus on holding human developers accountable rather than trying to police the software they run on their local machines.

"Guns don't kill people. People kill people"

Torvalds and the maintainers are acknowledging reality: developers are going to use AI tools to code faster, and trying to ban them is like trying to ban a specific brand of keyboard.

The author should elaborate on how exactly AI is like "a specific brand of keyboard". Last I checked a keyboard only enters what I type, without hallucinating 50 extra pages. And if AI, a tool that generates content, is like "a specific brand of keyboard", does that mean my brain is also a "specific brand of keyboard"?

I get their point. If you want to create good code by having AI create bad code and then spending twice the time to fix it, feel free to do that. But I'm in favor of a complete ban.

[–] alyth@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Out of curiosity how much code have you contributed to the Linux kernel?

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 16 points 5 hours ago

The (very obvious) point is that this cannot be enforced. So might as well deal with it upfront.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 31 points 12 hours ago

The keyboard thing is sort of a parable, it is as difficult to determine if code was generated in part by AI as it is to determine what keyboard was used to create it.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

AI is a useful tool for coding as long as it's being used properly. The problem isn't the tool, the problem is the companies who scraped the entire internet, trained LLM models, and then put them behind paywalls with no options to download the weights so that they could be self-hosted. Brazen, unaccountable profiteering off of the goodwill of many open source projects without giving anything back.

If LLMs were community-trained on available, open-source code with weights freely available for anyone to host there wouldn't be nearly as much animosity against the tech itself. The enemy isn't the tool, but the ones who built the tool at the expense of everyone and are hogging all the benefits.

[–] grozzle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

There are hundreds of such LLMs with published training sets and weights available on places like HuggingFace. Lots of people run their own LLMs locally, it's not hard if you have enough vram and a bit of patience to wait longer for each reply.

[–] ede1998@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Last I checked a keyboard only enters what I type

I've had (broken) keyboard "hallucinate" extra keystrokes before, because of stuck keys. Or ignore keypresses. But yeah, that means the keyboard is broken.