this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
602 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

83990 readers
4933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Let me guess, the John Ternus guy is an AI bro and Apple products are now gonna be heavily enshitified with AI.

Edit: yep, I was right http://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/04/20/apple-new-ceo-john-ternus-faces-defining-challenge-fixing-ai-strategy.html

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

The link you posted does not support your conclusion at all.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Ternus is the Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering and notoriously skeptical of new technology. If they wanted someone who was AI- minded, they would have made Craig Federighi CEO.

[–] coolfission@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago

apparently he helped lead the team behind M-series chips and Airpods which are Apple’s few good genuine innovations of the last decade so he seems promising!

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Where does it say he's an AI bro? It just said that he needs to show the investors that Apple can do more AI

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Would they have chosen anyone else to lead the push for AI?

I for one am completely convinced that Tim Cook is "leaving" because he wasn't pushing AI as hard as the shareholders wanted. They think they're falling behind, which in a way they are (but that's a good thing IMO), and now they're experiencing FOMO, as shareholders do.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

There have been rumors of Cook retiring for the past five years, at least, and I’m pretty sure that shareholders are quite happy with Apple market cap at almost $4 trillion.

It has nothing to do with AI.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Federighi is the one who talked Cook in to moving the company towards AI, and he’s the person who was put in charge of the AI-ification of Siri when the previous fly was let go. Turnus is a hardware guy. The two things he’s most responsible for are Apple Silicon and AirPods.

Oh, and he was the one who pushed for the Macbook Neo, which has been hugely successful -commercially, in terms of reception, and has even had CEOs of other companies like Dell saying it’s a serious threat to their business

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Cool. And now he's gonna be in charge of enshitifiying products with AI.

Tim left at a good time, and clearly he wasn't a big fan of AI in its current state, hence the replacement.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

when questioned, you have not given a source that john apple is more pro-AI

in fact the article you posted believes he’ll continue tim apple’s path:

"By choosing a hardware leader in John Ternus, Apple may be signaling that it still believes the future of AI will run through tightly integrated devices, not just software," said Timothy Hubbard, assistant professor of management at the University of Notre Dame.

i don’t think locally-run AI is enshittification since unlike e.g. satellite connection, local LLM does not have additional costs of connecting to a remote service

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not sold on the idea that’s why Cook is leaving, but I’m with you that Apple may be slow playing the push into AI. If they are dragging their feet, I actually appreciate it.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

All they would have to do is make a stance:

"We Are Pro Privacy and Anti AI"

And their popularity would skyrocket.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

And their stock would plummet. The stock market is irrational, and is heavily invested in AAPL.

I would love it, but the board/shareholders would oust any CEO who took that path.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It might take a dip, but if people responded very positively, maybe Apple could benefit from taking some risk on morally good things. Imagine if stockholders saw that. Apple stock would explode.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you paid attention to the stock market? It absolutely wouldn’t respond like that.

I mean, I wish it would react like you suggest, but I’m not optimistic enough to believe that it would.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

I refuse to lose hope.

[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

but why does tim Cook not suck? because he left?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Well, god damn it.