this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
118 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

84222 readers
5114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: The post was probably heavily AI written and contains mistakes to that effect, which is unfortunate. The data in general is still interesting though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The issue with using AI is that the author doesn't openly disclose the use at the beginning of the paper.

Yes, I know this particular write-up isn't for official submission to an academic journal, but sharing methodology is important.

I would have no problem with AI-assisted writing IF the author credited the service used and, where applicable, included the prompts used.

It should be similar to documenting any sourced material. It's not just about giving credit where credit is due. It's also about accountability.

What a dumb comment.

Why is this necessary? Does this add anything at all to the conversation?

I’ve run a honeypot for the last month and the data is near-identical to this. It’s definitely credible.

Ah, well then. Problem solved. Someone on the internet said it's credible, therefore it must be credible. Tell ya what - when you create a webpage to display your data and then provide an analysis of said data, I'll consider you credible. Until then, though, you are just some short-tempered, rude, anonymous voice shouting into the void.