this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
66 points (98.5% liked)
Fediverse
41841 readers
602 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You know, you're not the first person to say that about something I wrote. Neither of us use general AI, and I make a point to avoid all of those tools to do things "the old fashioned way".
It could be due to me being neurodivergent, or it could be that a certain kind of writing got slurped up by AI and that's the default style now. I don't know.
I work hard on everything I write.
If it helps, I definitely didn't think it was AI even after that comment primed me to consider it. There were one or two parts where I went "this is a pattern I see in AI, but mostly that's because it's a common writing structure in the stuff AI was trained on." I am also ND, though.
But also, it annoys me so deeply how many common things in human writing that AI picked up specifically because humans used it are now considered hallmarks of AI. Like, I get it, but also, don't fuck with my em-dash.
From us, Dad! AI learned it from watching us!!
i’ve read that ND people do get mistaken a lot for AI in writings! i feel you
I believe you, and I feel for you. The saddest part about AI is how it has tainted all high-effort, carefully organized work to the point that it makes it hard to distinguish between the most trustworthy content and the least trustworthy. We need better tools for information provenance. Like I said, the first thing I did was look into your backgrounds to try to understand "is this some AI slop bot or a real person with a real brain" and everything I looked at suggested it being legit and that's why I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt. But that doubt is everywhere nowadays. It's rough out there.
Ah, I was going to ask whether you happen to read a lot of AI generated text since that could have obv influenced your style
No, I just tend to break up my thoughts into different segments and structures, because otherwise the whole thing feels like I'm just rambling about a bunch of stuff.