this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
118 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
84324 readers
6407 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wish more people understood this problem isn't restricted to Flock systems: every modern IP surveillance system can (and does) share evidence digitally, or set access privileges to their systems (allowing for real-time monitoring by third parties: mostly law enforcement); or if you're a larger organization in the European Union, the GDPR requires a 'Data Protection Officer (DPO)' to have access to personal data being collected at all times, and must abide to any request being made by authorities, while under professional secrecy (and explicitly not disclose such additional processing, in access requests filed by data subjects). All of these seemingly separate systems (regardless of being privately or publicly owned), are increasingly growing interconnected, typically resulting into local 'Operation Control Centers (OCCs)'; which may in turn share data they aggregate to further national, or even globally spanning OCCs.
Minor quibble.
Self-host Frigate (https://frigate.video/), buy generic Power over Ethernet security cameras (Amcrest has good ones in my experience) and keep everything wired and isolated from your regular LAN. Then you actually control your own security system.
Buy a Nest camera from Amazon and it'll be easier. They'll do all of the work for you while helping themselves to video of your property and family for them to do with as they please.
It is in fact true that I could build a system that doesn't, but any random security camera on any random business I walk past on the street (public land, no implied consent for any activities on the premises)? I have to assume the worst about it now. It's not just an innocent way to protect property from thieves it's functionally now part of a massive violation of civil liberties.
Oh yeah, I agree.
The mass data sharing is the core issue. We're collectively creating a power that nobody should have and yet it's available for subscription without any regulations.
When surveillance cameras were first introduced, they taped to a VHS tape basically on the premises and if no one pulled the tape it would just get overridden. The technological capabilities of any and all surveillance cameras have changed so much that they have now become unacceptably dangerous for even non-criminals. Having a camera on Mia is harming me and why is that I don't even have the right to know let alone consent to. We need a massive social reorientation to understand surveillance as an inherently aggressive act that is socially unacceptable and morally wrong except in extreme limited circumstances which must justify themselves against danger those cameras posed to the people