this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
220 points (85.5% liked)

Fediverse

41875 readers
902 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did some analysis of the modlog and found this:

V8lPrxY1qxcISLe.png

Ok, bigger instances ban more often. Not surprising, because they have more communities and more users and more trouble. But hang on, dbzer0 isn't a very big instance. What happens if we do a ratio of bans vs number of users?

vyfUNYTrX9pHQeR.png

Ok, so lemmy.ml, dbzer0 and pawb are issue an outsized amount of bans for the number of users they have... But surely the number of communities the instance hosts is going to mean they have to ban more? Bans are used to moderate communities, not just to shield their user-base from the outside. Let's look at the number of bans per community hosted:

Yrc7TofOr88SeGt.png

Seems like dbzer0 really loves to ban. Even more than the marxists and the furries! What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners?

Raw-ish numbers and calculations are in this spreadsheet if anyone wants to make their own charts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It's not willful ignorance to block users, comms, or instances. I've been pushed to block news/politics comms across multiple lemmy instances just to save myself the time spent reading the smooth-brained mouth-breathers argue we should abandon money and build a utopia out of hopes and dreams.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It can be willful ignorance to do so, it isn't always. Blocks are very useful.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but in that case your argument seems in favor of staying with established systems even when central figures in those systems are corrupt. It's hard not to sympathize with the impulse to separate from systems with prominent corruption, but perhaps there is an argument to be made about the need to tolerate some level of corruption for sake of social structure.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

My point is really the commenter's seeming inability to find nuance. Or maybe more charitably, disinterest in finding nuance.

There's this childish kneejerk response, tuned to sound aligned with "the right side of history", that's really just people being allergic to information and ideas too different from their own. They go "ooo scary/bad! I heard about those tankies!" and just panic ban.

I've seen the same flavor of it where people who happen to have signed up to .ml, knowing nothing about the landscape and just to figure all this federated stuff out, get berated for ideas they don't share and never stated. Based on where their account is.

It's all just very shallow and much more like team sports than anything else. Virtue signalling. Which I guess shouldn't be too surprising.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

I blocked several political coms because I know I'm very flammable and opinionated, and would rather not get banned.