this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
723 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
925 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

>be me
>highschool gym class
>shirts vs skins
>take off shirt
>gym teacher sees my bruises
>get called into office
>asked if bruises are from home
>no these are from school
>oh ok
>never chosen for skins again
>thanks gym teacher

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SLaSZT@kbin.social 43 points 9 months ago (5 children)

High school gym classes are usually separated by gender. That said, I think this is fake - pinnies/vests are not very expensive and can be reused for years.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

even if separated, even for boys this feels icky. and if there's no coloured vest then how are the girls forming teams?

[–] SLaSZT@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You'd have to ask the 4chan OP about the lore of his made-up universe, I have no idea.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Uh, naw shirts vs skins absolutely was a thing in the 2000s. I hated it. Pretty SURE* girls did boring shit instead of team sports though.

Edit whoops

[–] ZeroTemp@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

I remember the girls always walking the track while the boys had to participate in whatever the planned unit was.

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

When I was in high school only girls got pinnies on a regular basis. It was icky. Gym class was also segregated.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

so the pinnies were there but they were only used for the girls?

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sort of, there were only enough for one class. Boys & girls ran separately, but at the same time. We only got them if the girls weren't using them.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

lol because buying extra would be so damn expensive

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

There seemed to be some political objection to it. It was a a strange time. Definitely a problem I had that I'm glad my son doesn't have to deal with.

[–] Surreal@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

That's US/EU standard. In many countries schools it's normal to not have luxuries like colored vest

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

You segregate by gender as well?

[–] SuspiciousUser@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

Definitely real, I did it in the 90s and hated it. You don't take your shirt off, you keep your arms in, but you raise the front behind your neck so it all bunches up at the top. I was chubby then and that was definitely a core memory of self-consciousness.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

We had em and still did skins vs shirts when it was hot outside