this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
317 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The bug was fixed, but it still adds itself as co-author by default if you as much as use code completion powered by Copilot.

Combined with the fact that this doesn't show up in your commit message dialog, and that is nothing but blatant advertising, this is just unacceptable.

I don't necessarily mind crediting Copilot if it did substantial amount of the work, but it also seems redundant nowadays when AI has become as ubiquitous as using an IDE. Having used it for code completion just doesn't seem to warrant co-author credit in that context. In other words if I had been able to edit that part of the commit message I'd probably be a lot less annoyed by this.

As it is, it's just blatant overreach by Microsoft. Microsoft doing Microsoft things. Nothing has changed since the 90s.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't include the person down the hall when I ask for their help unless they are making final design decisions alongside me. If copilot is doing 40% of the work, sure. Just existing nearby isn't enough.

[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, CoPilot isn't a person. It shouldn't be a co-author for the same reason Google and StackOverflow aren't.

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

If I copy a solution from SO I usually put in a comment with a link to the answer to cite my source. I don't mind crediting where credit is due, but claiming co-author for a spelling correction is a bit much.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. I was just describing where I put the bar, and it isn't even anywhere near it.

Especially after they dropped intellisense in favor of copilot. Just typical M$ shit.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If VSCode is just hijacking the in-IDE commit UI, is bypassing it as simple as committing from the command line?

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, you can get around it that way. You can also just disable it in VSCode settings. I could also just not use VSCode or CoPilot at all. It's not that can't be worked around; it's that we shouldn't have to. It's the violation of trust we're having issues with.