this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
247 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84411 readers
6114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CactusEcho@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Nice! I just don't like that only Git is supported. Mercurial also needs love.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Honest question: why use mercurial?

[–] vogi@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

to anybody reading this, could you please be so kind and reply to my comment if the question is answered?
dont think we have @remindme on here. :)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

@remindme@mstdn.social 24 hours

[–] CactusEcho@piefed.social 1 points 40 minutes ago (2 children)

Having alternatives is always good! And BTW, Git won not because it was better than mercurial...

[–] waldfee@feddit.org 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

The only thing better than perfect is standardised. Supporting two vcs-systems would mean that a lot of tooling would need to be duplicated for it

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

Sure, at the very beginning of the launch of Git, Mercurial was better/had more features/more mature/etc.

That's just not true after 20 years of mainstream git adoption and development today.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Is hg-git lacking specific features that you need?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 hours ago

Definitely. The last time I checked, your only hosting options if you wanted to use Mercurial directly were Heptapod and ($DEITY help us) Sourceforge.