this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
320 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

21437 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Why not give them away to homeless people? Homeless people are often hungry, and would certainly not regret eating 30 to 40 peaches.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And who is going to pay to water, tend, pick. And ship these to the homeless?

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Who ever is paying to destroy them, rip the trees out and rehab the land to something else, what they’re already doing isn’t free. Avoidable food waste should be illegal.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 11 hours ago

apparently they spoil very quickly if not frozen immediately, if there is no market they cant do anything witht ehpeaches. also the trees will attract alot of pests if its left unattended.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 13 points 14 hours ago

That (in their view) would be even worse, then peaches would become associated with the homeless and lose even more value!

The issue is that the idea of destroying product to protect its value is counter to anything good or reasonable.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

This might surprise you, but you can give food to homeless people right now. You don't need to wait for some peach-related mishap in California to do so.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why would that surprise them? What a weirdly confrontational response to someone you ostensibly agree with...

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 2 points 2 hours ago

You can't truly be a good person, unless you're smug and condescending about it.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, i don't understand, in what way would giving food to homeless people help the shareholders? Are the shareholders homeless?

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

This guy gets it.

Aw, gosh, thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't even considered your point among my disdain for huge amounts of food going to waste that could otherwise have helped people. You can pat yourself on the virtue signal now.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 14 hours ago

Cost to harvest peaches to freely give to homeless dudes: very non-zero

Cost to burn peach trees: zero