this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
589 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84502 readers
3632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Quantum computing will only be useful to a handful of people instead of mass consumer use. Quantum computers are mainly for cybersecurity.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago

only be useful to a handful of people

So in the end it's even more useful than the metaverse or NFT, and they hyped that shit up like crazy.

Only small parts of specific algorithms get a boost from quantum computing. I could imagine the NAG library offering quantum as a service for some of their routines

[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Quantum processors are already a thing. I dont think we'll see quantum powered consumer products for a while but I think they will eliminate the need for massive data centres and should be way better for the environment.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I dont think we'll see quantum powered consumer products for a while

Or ever. Quantum processors have to operate close to 0k to work

[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think we'll see instead. When it comes to tech, id never say never. But I know what you mean.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

When it comes to tech, id never say never.

Eh, there is a degree to that, but there's also the fact that you can't just break thermodynamics. With quantum effects you need to remove a lot of noise, and near-0k temperatures will do that.

Not only that, is there even a practical purpose to getting quantum computing on an individual level? While it's better for specialized problems, current transistor tech is way better at general use cases and is good enough that we don't really need significantly more power. And even if it was technologically possible to shrink dpwn quantum computing enough to fit in a desktop of phone, what's going to be the cost of it compared to transistors?

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 1 points 10 hours ago

You mean for comlutation