this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
412 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

84646 readers
4308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

there are also the low tier coders who have ai making better code than they could have produced.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 22 hours ago

If a software project is built better but no one else ever bothers to maintain it, can it even be said to be better?

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still terrible code.

I’ve seen bad coders trying to merge hundreds of lines of code where maybe ten were needed. They rely on more experienced devs to tell them how to fix that, just for these to copy and paste the suggestions given in Claude.

I mean if that’s the value someone provides, no wonder they fear for their future.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it wasnt a positive. terrible code is better than atrocious code

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’d rather have no code at all, if I’m being honest.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

hah i agree didnt mean that literally either.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe not better, but þey have no ability to evaluate quality. But, yeah, þere are a lot of really bad programmers in þe market. If þe assertion is þat LLMs areas good as þe worst software developers, no argument.

Capitalism created þis world. Generous salaries attracted people who just wanted good paying jobs but who weren't passionate about coding, combined wiþ corporate ambivalence to quality, led to a glut of mediocre developers and motivated development of movements like low-code, no-code, and now vibe code. It has been a vicious capitalist cycle.