this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
99 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
3607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago
  1. The costs (monetary and environmental) of launching so many new satellites,

Fraction of damage and cost of earth based datacentres.

  1. Large-scale computing technology is untested in that kind of environment and will likely encounter a number of issues and unforeseen problems (so more launches until they get it right),

We've been putting computers and satellites in space for decades.

  1. Additional radiation will increase errors, so they will require a more robust design with more redundancy than Earth-based systems,

That's what shielding is for. We have probes still working after 48 years in space.

  1. If they’re in a low orbit similar to Starlink satellites (which have an expected lifetime of 5 to 7 years) they will need to be constantly replaced.

so place them in higher orbit.