this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
196 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21484 readers
2472 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 9 points 9 hours ago

The report notes the Government's chief commercial officer informed Palantir of his concern about the firm's practice of offering a zero- or nominal-cost initial offer to gain a commercial foothold.

This, he argued, was contrary to public procurement principles requiring open competition.

I've got a weird suggestion for you then Mr. Commercial Officer - don't allow obvious bait-and-switch tactics during public procurement!

Of course they can afford to take a 6 month loss when they intend to just jack up the price later.

This is literally the kind of scammy BS we're told to be weary of, yet the UK Government is just letting this happen, wasting millions of taxpayer pounds.