this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
182 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21484 readers
1515 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So silly that they know how Palantir operates from things like this but then at the same time are currently giving them full access to everything in the NHS.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

i heard palantir charges a prenium for thier "surveillance" as to how good it is, is very questionable.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 7 points 6 hours ago

The report notes the Government's chief commercial officer informed Palantir of his concern about the firm's practice of offering a zero- or nominal-cost initial offer to gain a commercial foothold.

This, he argued, was contrary to public procurement principles requiring open competition.

I've got a weird suggestion for you then Mr. Commercial Officer - don't allow obvious bait-and-switch tactics during public procurement!

Of course they can afford to take a 6 month loss when they intend to just jack up the price later.

This is literally the kind of scammy BS we're told to be weary of, yet the UK Government is just letting this happen, wasting millions of taxpayer pounds.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 21 points 9 hours ago

Ah yes, the good old candyman tactic: the first one's free to rope you in.

Homes for Ukraine was set up in in March 2022, less than a month after Russia's full scale invasion.

Through a website, backed by an IT system, those who had a rent-free space in their home or a separate residence could to offer it to refugees.

In order to set this up quickly, then-Conservative government ministers accepted an offer from Palantir to build a system to administrate the scheme, based on its Foundry platform, for free for six months.

In a 2023 blog post, Palantir described the challenge of combining data from multiple government systems containing tens of thousands of visa applications and hundreds of thousands of accommodation offers.

Subsequent 12-month contracts were awarded - one worth £4.5m and another £5.5m, according to a National Audit Office report.

The report notes the Government's chief commercial officer informed Palantir of his concern about the firm's practice of offering a zero- or nominal-cost initial offer to gain a commercial foothold.

I'm not dismissing the work it takes to help refuges, but it still seems to me using Palantir for that is shooting cannons at sparrows. I wonder if they had other motivations beyond good publicity and what for Mr Thiel must be pocket money.