this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
863 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84733 readers
3645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Only thing I find annoying with full volume LUKS encryption is that it makes it difficult to resize partitions, it's a whole thing, but it's a minor hassle and not something I'd do every day anyway.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

Why not just encrypt the whole drive and then use virtual partitions within the encryption?

[–] slowbyrne@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I like to use btrfs subvolumes inside a luks lvm volume for this reason.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

VeraCrypt solves this issue. I leave my main OS unencrypted then simply store veracrypt partitions to the size I need and put files inside that as needed. I've dealt with resizing luks partitions and its not worth it. Especially if you build, maintain, or otherwise tinker with you system.

[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 8 points 20 hours ago

What? Btrfs subvolumes are basically the same as logical volumes. That's somewhat redundant.