this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
429 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

21523 readers
1315 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47052375

To understand how a New York City private jet tax could actually be implemented, you need to understand who controls the airports.

The Port Authority is a bi-state agency jointly controlled by the governors of New York and New Jersey with an annual operating budget of $10.1 billion and a proposed $45 billion capital plan from 2026 – 2035. It operates JFK, LaGuardia, Newark Liberty, and Teterboro — all rated high tax-risk under current political conditions. Teterboro Airport, which does not allow scheduled airline flights and only services private flights, handles approximately 177,000 arrivals and departures annually.

Westchester County Airport (HPN) is not a Port Authority facility. It is owned and operated by Westchester County — outside Mamdani’s direct political sphere and outside the joint gubernatorial control structure of the Port Authority. This makes it the most insulated major reliever airport in the New York metro under current political conditions.

Republic Airport (FRG) on Long Island is New York State property — its vulnerability depends on whether Governor Hochul aligns with Mamdani’s agenda, which remains an open question.

Key policy context: The Port Authority has the authority to set fees, surcharges, and access terms at its facilities without requiring standard legislative processes in many scenarios. The question isn’t just whether a tax gets proposed — it’s whether the mechanism to implement it already exists. In many cases, it does.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Is this... a genuine, honest to god "article" talking about private jet taxation like it's some unfair agenda? This reminds me of those articles talking about what trans persons need to know when anti-trans legislation is enacted in the states. Only those articles had a legitimate concern and this is a fucking joke of an article. I know, it's ths fortune, but I can read through the lines how offended the author is that Mamdani would dare tax those poor private jet owners. Now I want Mamdani to double on this. Make those rich fucks wanna-be aristrocats squirm and seethe.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The "article" is an ad posing like an op-ed at best.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 15 hours ago

private jet taxation like it’s some unfair agenda?

People who own / operate private jets already know: there's no such thing as fair or unfair. There are only agendas, and their targets.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, it reads like a not-too-funny Onion piece. I kept waiting for the punchline.