Technology

59674 readers

2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

446

A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

205 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco::A Waymo car was destroyed in San Francisco as a crowd began vandalizing it and ultimately set the car on fire. Nobody was in the vehicle at the time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's hilarious really. They sense a foreign object and they have to assume an incident happened, so they sit disabled. They go into a shutdown mode until a technician goes on the scene and resets it. As to the technical reasons for "why", that's proprietary and closed source, but based on the behavior we can infer a lot.

[–] KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yep, and for good reason honestly. I work in CV and while I don't work on autonomous vehicles, many of the folks I know have previously worked at companies or research institutes on these kinds of problems and all of them agree that in a scenario like this, you should treat the state of the vehicle as compromised and go into an error/shutdown mode.

Nobody wants to give their vehicle an override that can potentially harm the safety of those inside it or around it, and practically speaking there aren't many options that guarantee safety other than this.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

But don't they have some sort of remote control? Does it need a technician to see that somebody just put a random cone in there?

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

"Waymo technician disables safety feature, car kills pedestrian" Or "Waymo disables safety feature to deal with orange codes, car plowed through construction area and killed ten workers"

Not that it's happened, but I imagine their risk management advice says they have to send a tech out to reset it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 13 points 9 months ago

"Waymo technician disables safety feature and car kills pedestrian, hacks Bluetooth and starts making threats against humanity"

See, just not worth it.