this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
182 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

84891 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/38188482

Tech vendors promised personalized, frictionless learning. What American schools got instead was mind-numbing, data-hungry junk software that devalues teachers and shortchanges students. A growing movement, led by alarmed parents, is saying enough.

Technology’s allure is always future oriented: Personal computing was going to supercharge productivity; social media and smartphones would strengthen interpersonal connections; and now AI will streamline the world of work. And for three-quarters of a century, education technology vendors have promised to optimize student learning and eliminate the busywork of teaching. But as Charles Logan, T. Philip Nichols, and Antero Garcia recently argued in Kappan, “the future they’re selling has not arrived — and perhaps it never will. But de-skilling, surveillance, and extraction — all of that is happening now, in our classrooms, today.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lauha@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Gamification per se is not a bad thing. Gamification is anvalid way to get better engagement and retention.

[–] upandatom@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

According to recent research, yes.

But research is lacking in the retention of skills and knowledge once the gamification is removed.

Does Duolingo create life long learners, or is it just something to pass the time and feel good about getting a score streak.

My theory is almost all Duolingo users would quit learning if Duolingo went away tomorrow and everyone has to restart at 0 on a new app/service.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 13 hours ago

I know some avid Duolingo users. After multiple year-long streaks they have learned and retained quite a bit... also quite a bit less than they would have learned and retained after spending a season in an immersion setting where they used the language all day every day. Both routes to learning have their pros and cons... neither one suits everybody.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I was talking about gamification in general. Are you talking specifically about Duolingo?

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When gamification is used to persuade or hold a user into a subscribed service. Its predatory. It can be used to influence or motivate learners, classroom or online. But when used to further you being on the app, its not good.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Exactly what I said, gamification is not bad in itself.

Gamification is not the problem. The problem is predatory behaviour.