this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
471 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

84920 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
471
Google is cannibalizing the web to feed AI (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 day ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, whether a human or a better model, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse.

Yeah if you have a source of truth then your model is basically getting trained on that.

It’s like already having the answer

[–] chunes@lemmy.world -5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The point is that it only needs to comprise a very small part of the model.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago

My point was that having a verifier means your not really training a model on another model’s data, it’s basically as if you get new raw data from a non AI source