this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
1361 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84940 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iuseasahibtw@ani.social 65 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s being exempt because the Government can’t enforce this requirement on FOSS. Linux isn’t managed by a corporation and I don’t think people realize this yet.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I would pay money to hear Linus on the phone with these self-important assholes.

we want you to force user verification in all Linux.

yeah, fuck you.

...

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Give homie some credit, I think he would at least ask "why?" first. Then also wish them "good luck!" on enforcing it.

[–] Sualtam@lemmus.org 3 points 11 hours ago

You can't force it on any Linux distro, but on everybody who has to give a shit about compliance.

Red Hat is the biggest power on Linux.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean they could force big corpo to not allow anyone who can't verify age to use their services.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This is sponsored by meta to push the age requirement tracking onto the os rather than Facebook directly to avoid liability when under age kids access harmful content

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Which is insane, as the OS doesn't have any way to authoritatively measure the user's age and so they have to be 'honor system' where the age is whatever the user says the age is, or require some online account with identity validation, which is what facebook tries to do anyway.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

An unverified age bracket in the OS that provides that to web services is the correct way to do it (a parent setting up a computer or account for a kid checks one box and suddenly google safe search, etc, everyone else doesn't check the box, done).

I suspect meta is hoping to get better unique account to human mapping in their surveillance machine.