this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
815 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

85080 readers
3976 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 64 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Does that mean that when a group finds him and straps him to a guillotine we'll be able to get multi-angled high resolution video for prosperity?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

As long as it's being recorded it's considered best behavior by this logic.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think the global rich list is so busy investing in robotics?

Before, when things to too far, even the soldiers would revolt.

Now, all you need is electricity to suppress the population.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Not sure what you’re saying here.

Are robotics good enough right now to suppress a population? No, clearly not.

Will they be good enough in 10 years? Quite possibly.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

Humanoid bipedal are sketch, but 50Cal robot dog tanks wouldn't break a sweat.

I fear we're closer to tanks from Ghost in the Shell than we want to be, they just won't be as cheery and reasonable

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I'm just having some fun.