this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
181 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryantown@lemmy.world 69 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's the surprise here? Turns out it's expensive.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 33 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Microsoft was deceptive here and never made it clear exactly what sort of deal you were getting with the flat rate. There was no indication of the actual magnitude.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

It was easy to know how much the slop machine costs to run if you bothered to put even a tiny effort into finding out.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah especially because they now have some convoluted method involving different counts of processing, cache etc. But the developer has no easy way of seeing those statistics and thus has no feel for them. And developers already have little control over how much tokens a task takes. Which was fine with the flat rate, just use the service. But now that those things actually matter, the stats should be way easier to see?

So in typical Microsoft fashion not only did they raise prices they somehow made it even more shit. Like the AI already sucked, but does the service itself need to suck as well?

Not being able to control costs and very vague productivity improvement claims makes the ROI impossible to calculate. So even if the AI wasn't shit, it would still be hard to figure out if it's even helping at all.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

different counts of processing, cache etc

Don't all the providers do this, though? Anthropic/Claude has different pricing based on if you're caching for five mins vs one hour (which are the only two options for cache TTL). https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well, the point here is the deception. So, if you can find a similar link from the past from Microsoft…

[–] ryantown@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

It was very much a red flag when they shut down signups.