170
US firm validates 1.1-GW nuclear fusion plant design to deliver 400 MW electricity
(interestingengineering.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
170 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
85168 readers
3897 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is like asking “why do R&D to invent solar panels when gas has always been 25¢/gallon?”
Technological progress isn’t free.
I'm just not convinced progress scales 1:1 with increasing technological complexity. In fact, I think progress might be better achieved by lowering costs and complexity, rather than increasing them. Maybe more isn't always better.
It's funny you should mention scaling, because fusion does not scale like that at all, it scales much better. If you can get a small reactor to work at all, a larger reactor designed with the same principles is significantly more efficient. With fusion, bigger is better.
I do hear what you're saying though. Sometimes there are just simpler solutions. And I actually think you're right, in most use cases solar + batteries is a better solution than a fusion plant. That said, solar + batteries has only become truly economical within the last 5-10 years. At this point there's really nothing "Simple" about photovoltaic or battery technology, lifetimes of study have gone into them. And 25 years ago, solar was cute, it was pie in the sky. And you'd hear these same arguments "shouldn't we be focusing efforts on something we already know works?"
The amount of electricity we will be able to extract from nuclear fusion, while using an extremely small amount of fuel, means that solar panels may cease to be practical in the first place.
Fusion still has a massive up front cost that needs to be recouped for decades.
So you’re saying solar panels were a mistake and we should have stuck to horses?
I should clarify. I think increasing technological complexity can lead to progress, but I don't think it always does. I think progress from increasing technological complexity often follows an s-curve. I'm not denying the progress that has come from the significant technological advancement of the last few centuries, I'm just not sure continued technological advancement will lead to that same level of progress over the next few centuries.
Maybe, but many things are increasingly efficient. Maybe energy need for most things is plateauing and flat id goud enough. You’ll just need fusion for datacenters