this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
883 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I never understood wifi cameras, because yes of course it's super easy to jam them. You need a power cable there anyway, is a data cable then really such a hassle?

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. With WiFi cameras you don't need to run any cable, just plug in to the nearest power outlet. That's very appealing to people.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surprised they haven't got them based on powerline (running a slightly worse ethernet though the electric lines). That way you'd still only need the one cable, and be able to lock people into your own powerline ecosystems.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Power line Ethernet is actually more similar to wifi than Ethernet the way it works, it uses your power cables as an antenna. Probably won't be jammed as easily though, you may need to plug the jammer into an outlet.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

I have a wifi camera. It saves locally to sd card. When it's jammed, it won't be accessible, but it'll still record motion, so recording will be accessible as long as camera itself isn't stolen.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think a lot of them, like the Google doorbell camera use rechargeable batteries. So you don't even need the power cable. Just take it off of the mount every few weeks to charge it back up.

Then throw it in the trash in 2-3 years once the battery sufficiently degrades and buy a whole new one of course.

[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

More like throw it in the trash when gooogle decides it's obsolete and bricks it for "security concerns"

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Painful how true that is. It's awful.

At least some doorbell cameras power themselves off the doorbell power supply, so it's not all devices with battery. Still more than should exist though.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Lol, there's even 2 solutions that do both. Power over Ethernet and power line networking, so you only have to drag 1 wire across the house/attic

[–] TicklishRocket@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

My cameras are wireless. Some I recharge every 3-4 months, the others are powered by solar.

[–] disheveledWallaby@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

You can get POE(power over ethernet) cameras that dont require a separate power source. Closed circuit cameras are the only way to go.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My video doorbell takes power from the existing doorbell wiring, but there’s no reasonable way to use that for data, so it’s WiFi (I really should see if I can pull Ethernet through but then I need to pay for a new camera)

Other models are battery powered and supposedly last as long as half a year.

I’ve seen WiFi cameras you can hang anywhere: battery powered and kept charged with a small solar panel

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just power all of my cameras with POE