this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
625 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85355 readers
4188 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of all companies, though, Microsoft is one of the few who could easily afford to sink a few billion into starting in-house chip production.

And even if they only ever produce chips for their own products, they'll still probably come out ahead in the long run, because of all the money they'll save on not paying inflated prices for others' chips to use in Microsoft hardware.

That 'in the long run' part is the problem, though. Corps can never see beyond the next quarterly earnings report. An investment that will take years to pay off ... that's just out of the question.

[โ€“] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Try decades.... Chip fabs take like 5-7 years just to get running and then double that to recoup. No company is going to gamble on a possibility 15 year investment for a very obvious bubble.