100
Arch Linux Now Believes Malware Incident Under Control: More Than 1,500 Affected Packages
(www.phoronix.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
100 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
85355 readers
4188 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Haven't seen an arch fuckup like this since they switched to signed packages.
This is not ArchLinux' fuckup. The AUR's popularity exploded after certain Arch-based distros (and software) decided to treat the AUR as an additional software repository, even part of package management, and automate the process of installation. Which also slows the process of discovering the malware. And makes panicky users wave their arms.
May I remind everyone of Arch core principles and statements wrt AUR - several quotes from their wiki:
Note how the crucial PKGBUILD is mentioned in the first sentence, and dozens of times in the article that follows.
The AUR even includes PGP signing; not perfect, but a useful additional step. But, alas, many AUR helpers include "skip PGP check".
Archlinux devs, maintainers and users have been saying this for over a decade, and warning against using the AUR in such ways. But short of shutting the whole thing down, what can they do? The few things that can reasonably be done I'm sure are being implemented right now.
I wouldn't really categorise it as a fuckup. These are unofficial packages from the AUR. You should trust them as much as random install scripts from a no-name website or git repo.
It's no arch fuckup. The AUR is not an arch linux redponsibility and has always been "untrusted" - you should always verify what you're downloading and building.
Problem is that bazzite and cachy are arch-based, but targeted at a group of people that arch doesn't target. So you have users that just blindly download scripts from the AUR without doing proper verification.
This is more the fault of those distros and AUR helpers than arch.
I thought bazzite was based on an atomic version of fedora?
it is
Yep. There's no AUR for bazzite since it's based on fedora immutable, unless I'm mistaken and there's a way to do so anyway somehow. Still, bazzite and AUR do not go hand in hand AFAIK as it's meant to be an immutable system.